What is the so-called 'bedroom tax'?

  • Under controversial plans, those living in social housing who are deemed to have a spare bedroom will be asked to downsize or face a cut in benefits from April.
  • Ministers want to cut housing benefit by 14% for those deemed to have one extra bedroom and 25% for claimants with two or more spare bedrooms.

How many people will this affect?

  • The 'bedroom tax' will affect around 660,000 social housing tenants across the country.

Who will be affected?

  • Separated parents who share the care of their children and who may have been allocated an extra bedroom to reflect this. Benefit rules mean that there must be a designated ‘main carer’ for children (who receives the extra benefit).
  • Couples who use their spare bedroom when recovering from an illness or operation.
  • Foster carers because foster children are not counted as part of the household for benefit purposes.
  • Parents whose children visit but are not part of the household.
  • Families with disabled children.
  • Disabled people including people living in adapted or specially designed properties.

Source: The National Housing Federation

Why do the government want to cut housing benefit?

  • The government says the proposals will save money and help deal with a housing shortage by encouraging people to move out of homes that are too big for them.

 

We believe this tax is wrong.  We believe thousands of people with a disability will face additional costs and may even lose their home because of this tax (the DWP estimates that 420,000 of the 660,000 to be initially affected by the tax are disabled).  We are campaigning against this and we want your help. 

 

Please tell us if this will affect you and what it will mean to you.  People stories are one of the strongest ways we can show the unjust impact of this tax.

 

In addition please ask your MP to add their signature to an early day motion called under occupancy penalty and the vulnerable. You can view the motion on the parliament website by clicking here.

Views: 298

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Grainia Long, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Housing, put it:


Other people are also unfairly affected ... people who need a bigger home because of a disability should also be exempt. We know that the open market doesn't cater particularly well for these people, and they should not be penalised for living in social housing when in many cases there is nowhere else for them to go.

National Housing Federation chief executive, David Orr, this week said:


The bedroom tax is still an unfair and perverse tax which will hit hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people living in social housing. They are being punished for a weak housing policy that for years has failed to build enough affordable homes.

Another kick in the teeth this morning. Although I send my heartfelt sympathy to the family of the late Baroness Thatcher, according to William Hague the UK can "afford" to contribute £3m towards the funeral expenses. Also be prepared to use taxpayers monies to bring MPs home from overseas, quoted to be upto £3,750 in traveling expenses.
Now I'm not debating the fact that Taxpayers money is also used to pay for the country's benefits, but it just angers me, the fact that £3m plus can be magically taken from the public purse at a minutes notice. Think what that money could subsidise. Rant over.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Gordon White.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service